FORM-2014.03.29-10Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark one)
| |
ý | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 29, 2014
Or
| |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 000-50307
FormFactor, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
Delaware | | 13-3711155 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
7005 Southfront Road, Livermore, California 94551
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(925) 290-4000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
______________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of the Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
| | |
Large Accelerated filer o | | Accelerated filer x |
| | |
Non-accelerated filer o | | Smaller reporting company o |
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
As of May 5, 2014, 55,548,703 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, were outstanding.
FORMFACTOR, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 29, 2014
INDEX
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
FORMFACTOR, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (In thousands, except per share amounts) (Unaudited) |
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 29, 2014 | | March 30, 2013 |
Revenues | $ | 55,959 |
| | $ | 52,620 |
|
Cost of revenues | 43,634 |
| | 43,545 |
|
Gross profit | 12,325 |
| | 9,075 |
|
Operating expenses: | |
| | |
|
Research and development | 9,747 |
| | 10,929 |
|
Selling, general and administrative | 12,254 |
| | 14,618 |
|
Restructuring charges, net | 1,997 |
| | 3,980 |
|
Impairment of long-lived assets | 743 |
| | 58 |
|
Total operating expenses | 24,741 |
| | 29,585 |
|
Operating loss | (12,416 | ) | | (20,510 | ) |
Interest income, net | 79 |
| | 107 |
|
Other income (expense), net | (66 | ) | | 423 |
|
Loss before income taxes | (12,403 | ) | | (19,980 | ) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | 308 |
| | (207 | ) |
Net loss | $ | (12,711 | ) | | $ | (19,773 | ) |
Net loss per share: | |
| | |
|
Basic and Diluted | $ | (0.23 | ) | | $ | (0.37 | ) |
Weighted-average number of shares used in per share calculations: | |
| | |
|
Basic and diluted | 55,050 |
| | 53,664 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
FORMFACTOR, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (In thousands) (Unaudited) |
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 29, 2014 | | March 30, 2013 |
Net loss | $ | (12,711 | ) | | $ | (19,773 | ) |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | 141 |
| | (1,079 | ) |
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale marketable securities | 2 |
| | (49 | ) |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | 143 |
| | (1,128 | ) |
Comprehensive loss | $ | (12,568 | ) | | $ | (20,901 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
FORMFACTOR, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In thousands, except share and per share amounts) (Unaudited) |
| | | | | | | |
| March 29, 2014 | | December 28, 2013 |
ASSETS | |
| | |
|
Current assets: | |
| | |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 49,199 |
| | $ | 59,196 |
|
Marketable securities | 94,798 |
| | 91,895 |
|
Accounts receivable, net | 37,057 |
| | 30,189 |
|
Inventories, net | 21,319 |
| | 20,707 |
|
Deferred tax assets | 2,777 |
| | 2,776 |
|
Refundable income taxes | 782 |
| | 782 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 7,372 |
| | 6,106 |
|
Total current assets | 213,304 |
| | 211,651 |
|
Restricted cash | 435 |
| | 435 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net | 30,049 |
| | 35,190 |
|
Goodwill | 30,731 |
| | 30,731 |
|
Intangibles, net | 52,398 |
| | 57,470 |
|
Deferred tax assets | 3,988 |
| | 3,960 |
|
Other assets | 1,273 |
| | 1,271 |
|
Total assets | $ | 332,178 |
| | $ | 340,708 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |
| |
|
|
Current liabilities: | |
| |
|
|
Accounts payable | $ | 15,921 |
| | $ | 16,313 |
|
Accrued liabilities | 13,814 |
| | 13,985 |
|
Capital leases, current portion | 140 |
| | 270 |
|
Income taxes payable | 532 |
| | 172 |
|
Deferred revenue | 7,392 |
| | 7,030 |
|
Total current liabilities | 37,799 |
| | 37,770 |
|
Long-term income taxes payable | 2,473 |
| | 2,497 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities | 3,029 |
| | 3,029 |
|
Deferred rent and other liabilities | 3,364 |
| | 3,326 |
|
Total liabilities | 46,665 |
| | 46,622 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16) |
|
| |
|
|
Stockholders’ equity: | |
| | |
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value: | |
| | |
10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding at March 29, 2014 and December 28, 2013, respectively | — |
| | — |
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value: | |
| | — |
|
250,000,000 shares authorized; 55,383,795 and 54,649,600 shares issued and outstanding at March 29, 2014 and December 28, 2013, respectively | 55 |
| | 55 |
|
Additional paid-in capital | 699,626 |
| | 695,631 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (106 | ) | | (249 | ) |
Accumulated deficit | (414,062 | ) | | (401,351 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity | 285,513 |
| | 294,086 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 332,178 |
| | $ | 340,708 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
FORMFACTOR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In thousands) (Unaudited) |
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 29, 2014 | | March 30, 2013 |
Cash flows from operating activities: | |
| | |
|
Net loss | $ | (12,711 | ) | | $ | (19,773 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | |
| | |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 8,131 |
| | 7,407 |
|
Amortization of discount on investments | 117 |
| | 14 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense | 2,570 |
| | 3,035 |
|
Deferred income tax provision | — |
| | 129 |
|
Provision (recovery) for doubtful accounts receivable | 5 |
| | (3 | ) |
Provision for excess and obsolete inventories | 2,606 |
| | 2,701 |
|
Loss on disposal and write-off of long-lived assets | — |
| | 148 |
|
Impairment of long-lived assets | 743 |
| | 58 |
|
Non-cash restructuring | 600 |
| | 2,743 |
|
Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses | (174 | ) | | 131 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: | |
| | |
|
Accounts receivable | (6,781 | ) | | (4,806 | ) |
Inventories | (3,216 | ) | | (3,781 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | (328 | ) | | 292 |
|
Refundable income taxes | — |
| | 511 |
|
Other assets | — |
| | 462 |
|
Accounts payable | 618 |
| | 3,598 |
|
Accrued liabilities | 212 |
| | (2,977 | ) |
Income tax payable | 335 |
| | 61 |
|
Deferred rent and other liabilities | 34 |
| | 7 |
|
Deferred revenues | 363 |
| | 376 |
|
Net cash used in operating activities | (6,876 | ) | | (9,667 | ) |
Cash flows from investing activities: | |
| | |
|
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment | (1,638 | ) | | (2,725 | ) |
Proceeds from sale of subsidiary | 27 |
| | — |
|
Purchases of marketable securities | (31,693 | ) | | (17,170 | ) |
Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities | 28,675 |
| | 34,470 |
|
Change in restricted cash | — |
| | (103 | ) |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | (4,629 | ) | | 14,472 |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: | |
| | |
|
Proceeds from issuances of common stock | 1,425 |
| | 1,220 |
|
Purchase and retirement of common stock | — |
| | (3 | ) |
Payments made on capital leases | (131 | ) | | (217 | ) |
Net cash provided by financing activities | 1,294 |
| | 1,000 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 214 |
| | (667 | ) |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (9,997 | ) | | 5,138 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year | 59,196 |
| | 72,243 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 49,199 |
| | $ | 77,381 |
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
FORMFACTOR, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In thousands) (Unaudited) |
| | | | | | | |
Supplemental cash flow disclosures: | |
| | |
|
Changes in accounts payable and accrued liabilities related to property, plant and equipment purchases | $ | (1,081 | ) | | $ | (33 | ) |
Income and property taxes refunded, net | $ | (38 | ) | | $ | (912 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
FORMFACTOR, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 — Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of presentation. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of FormFactor, Inc. and our subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and pursuant to the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Our interim financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary to fairly present our financial position, results of operations and cash flows have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 29, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 27, 2014, or for any other period. The balance sheet at December 28, 2013 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The condensed consolidated financial statements include our accounts as well as those of our wholly-owned subsidiaries after elimination of all inter-company balances and transactions.
The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and may result in material effects on our consolidated operating results and financial position.
These financial statements and notes should be read with the consolidated financial statements and notes for the year ended December 28, 2013 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 7, 2014.
Fiscal year. We operate on a 52/53 week fiscal year, whereby the fiscal year ends on the last Saturday of December. Fiscal 2014 and 2013 each contain 52 weeks and the first three months of fiscal 2014 and 2013 each contained 13 weeks. Fiscal 2014 will end on December 27, 2014.
Critical Accounting Policies. Our critical accounting policies have not changed during the three months ended March 29, 2014 from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2013.
Reclassifications. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year's Consolidated Balance Sheet to conform to the current period presentation.
Note 2 — Concentration of Credit and Other Risks
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents, marketable securities and trade receivables. Our cash equivalents and marketable securities are held in safekeeping by large, credit worthy financial institutions. We invest our excess cash primarily in U.S. banks, government and agency bonds, money market funds and corporate obligations. We have established guidelines relative to credit ratings, diversification and maturities that seek to maintain safety and liquidity. Deposits in these banks may exceed the amounts of insurance provided on such deposits. To date, we have not experienced any losses on our deposits of cash and cash equivalents.
We market and sell our products to a narrow base of customers and generally do not require collateral. Three customers accounted for 17%, 16% and 15% of revenues during the three months ended March 29, 2014 and two customers accounted for 19% and 18% of revenues during the three months ended March 30, 2013. No other customers accounted for more than 10% of total revenues in either of these fiscal periods.
At March 29, 2014, four customers accounted for 23%, 17%, 12% and 11% of gross accounts receivable. At December 28, 2013, three customers accounted for approximately 21%, 15% and 11% of gross accounts receivable. No other customers accounted for more than 10% of gross accounts receivable at either of these fiscal period ends. We operate in the intensely competitive semiconductor industry, including the Dynamic Random Access Memory, or DRAM, Flash memory, and System-on-Chip, or SoC markets, which have been characterized by price erosion, rapid technological change, short product life, cyclical market patterns and heightened foreign and domestic competition. Significant technological changes in the industry could adversely affect our operating results.
Certain components for our wafer probe card products that meet our requirements are available only from a limited number of suppliers. The rapid rate of technological change and the necessity of developing and manufacturing products with short life cycles may intensify our reliance on such suppliers. The inability to obtain components as required, or to develop alternative sources, if and as required in the future, could result in delays or reductions in product shipments, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Note 3 — Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill recorded from the acquisition of MicroProbe on October 16, 2012 was $30.7 million as of March 29, 2014 and remained unchanged from the amounts recorded as of December 28, 2013. The Company has not recorded any historical goodwill impairments as of March 29, 2014.
The changes in intangible assets during the three months ended March 29, 2014 and the net book value of intangible assets as of March 29, 2014 and December 28, 2013 were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Intangible Assets, Gross Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Intangible Assets, Net | | Weighted Average Useful Life |
Other Intangible Assets (1) | | December 28, 2013 | | Additions/Disposals | | March 29, 2014 | | December 28, 2013 | | Expense, net | | March 29, 2014 | | December 28, 2013 | | March 29, 2014 | | March 29, 2014 |
Existing developed technologies | | $ | 51,248 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 51,248 |
| | $ | 18,955 |
| | $ | 4,399 |
| | $ | 23,354 |
| | $ | 32,293 |
| | $ | 27,894 |
| | 2.3 |
Trade name | | 4,388 |
| | — |
| | 4,388 |
| | 530 |
| | 110 |
| | 640 |
| | 3,858 |
| | 3,748 |
| | 8.5 |
Customer relationships | | 17,000 |
| | — |
| | 17,000 |
| | 2,581 |
| | 563 |
| | 3,144 |
| | 14,419 |
| | 13,856 |
| | 6.5 |
Total finite-lived intangible assets | | 72,636 |
| | — |
| | 72,636 |
| | 22,066 |
| | 5,072 |
| | 27,138 |
| | 50,570 |
| | 45,498 |
| | |
In-process research and development | | 6,900 |
| | — |
| | 6,900 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6,900 |
| | 6,900 |
| | |
Total intangible assets | | $ | 79,536 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 79,536 |
| | $ | 22,066 |
| | $ | 5,072 |
| | $ | 27,138 |
| | $ | 57,470 |
| | $ | 52,398 |
| | |
(1) Excludes fully amortized intangible assets
The in-process research and development ("IPR&D") assets are classified as indefinite lived intangible assets that are not currently subject to amortization but are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. The IPR&D assets will be subject to amortization upon completion of their respective research projects and at the start of commercialization. The fair values assigned to IPR&D assets were determined using the income approach based on estimates and judgments regarding risks inherent in the development process, including the likelihood of achieving technological success and market acceptance. If an IPR&D project is abandoned, the acquired technology attributable to the project will be expensed in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.
For the three months ended March 29, 2014, amortization expense of $4.4 million and $0.7 million was included in the cost of revenues and selling, general and administrative expenses, respectively. For the three months ended March 30, 2013, amortization expense of $3.6 million and $0.8 million was included in cost of revenues and selling, general and administrative expense, respectively.
Based on the carrying values of the finite-lived intangible assets recorded as of March 29, 2014 and assuming no subsequent additions to or impairment of the underlying assets, the remaining estimated annual amortization expense is expected to be as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | |
Fiscal Year | | Amount |
2014 | | $ | 13,709 |
|
2015 | | 12,739 |
|
2016 | | 8,720 |
|
2017 | | 2,551 |
|
2018 | | 2,501 |
|
and thereafter | | 5,278 |
|
Total | | $ | 45,498 |
|
Note 4 — Restructuring Charges
Restructuring charges include costs related to employee termination benefits, cost of long-lived assets abandoned or impaired, as well as contract termination costs. Restructuring charges are reflected separately as "Restructuring charges, net" in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. A summary of the actions we have taken during the three months ended March 29, 2014 and March 30, 2013, the purpose of which were to improve operating efficiency, streamline and simplify our operations and reduce our operating costs, are discussed below.
2014 Restructuring Activities
On January 27, 2014, we announced a global organizational restructuring and cost reduction plan (the "Q1 2014 Restructuring Plan"). As part of the plan, the Company eliminated 52 full-time employees. In addition, we reduced our temporary workforce by 9 positions. We recorded $2.0 million of restructuring charges during the first fiscal quarter of fiscal 2014, which was comprised of $1.4 million in severance and related benefits and $0.6 million in impairment charges for certain equipment that would no longer be utilized.
The liabilities we accrued represent our best estimate of the obligations we expect to incur and could be subject to adjustment as market conditions change. The remaining cash payments associated with our various reductions in workforce are expected to be paid by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2014. As such, the restructuring accrual is recorded as a current liability within ‘Accrued liabilities’ in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
2013 Restructuring Activities
In the first fiscal quarter of fiscal 2013, we implemented a restructuring plan (the "Q1 2013 Restructuring Plan") which resulted in the reduction of our global workforce by 31 employees across the organization. In addition we reduced our temporary workforce by approximately 20 positions. We also suspended development activities and engineering efforts for our next generation DRAM Matrix platform and terminated development activities for a certain SoC product platform. We recorded
$4.0 million of restructuring charges during the first quarter of fiscal 2013, which was comprised of $1.3 million in severance and related benefits and $2.7 million in impairment charges for certain equipment that would no longer be utilized. The activities comprising this restructuring activity were completed in fiscal 2013.
The activities in the restructuring accrual for the three months ended March 29, 2014 were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Employee Severance and Benefits | | Property and Equipment Impairment | | Total |
Accrual at December 28, 2013 | $ | 138 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 138 |
|
Restructuring charges | 1,397 |
| | 600 |
| | 1,997 |
|
Cash payments | (1,414 | ) | | — |
| | (1,414 | ) |
Asset impairments | — |
| | (600 | ) | | (600 | ) |
Non-cash settlements | (1 | ) | | — |
| | (1 | ) |
Accrual at March 29, 2014 | $ | 120 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 120 |
|
The activities in the restructuring accrual for the three months ended March 30, 2013 were as follows (in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Employee Severance and Benefits | | Property and Equipment Impairment | | Contract Termination and Other Costs | | Total |
Accrual at December 29, 2012 | $ | 548 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 68 |
| | $ | 616 |
|
Restructuring charges | 1,318 |
| | 2,743 |
| | — |
| | 4,061 |
|
Cash payments | (1,291 | ) | | (29 | ) | | — |
| | (1,320 | ) |
Asset impairment | — |
| | (2,743 | ) | | — |
| | (2,743 | ) |
Adjustment to restructuring charges | (76 | ) | | 46 |
| | (51 | ) | | (81 | ) |
Other settlements | 10 |
| | (14 | ) | | — |
| | (4 | ) |
Accrual at March 30, 2013 | $ | 509 |
| | $ | 3 |
| | $ | 17 |
| | $ | 529 |
|
Note 5 — Fair Value
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
We measure and report certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis, including money market funds, U.S. Treasury securities, agency securities, commercial paper and foreign currency derivatives (see Note 17 to condensed Consolidated Financial Statements - Derivative Financial Instruments, for a discussion of fair value of foreign currency derivatives).
Fair value measured on a recurring basis as of March 29, 2014 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Total |
Assets: | | | | | |
Cash equivalents | | | | | |
Money market funds | $ | 25,155 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 25,155 |
|
Commercial paper | — |
| | 5,599 |
| | 5,599 |
|
Marketable securities | | | | | |
U.S. Treasuries | — |
| | 51,404 |
| | 51,404 |
|
Agency securities (Federal) | — |
| | 37,795 |
| | 37,795 |
|
Total | $ | 25,155 |
| | $ | 94,798 |
| | $ | 119,953 |
|
Fair value measured on a recurring basis as of December 28, 2013 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Total |
Assets: | | | | | |
Cash equivalents | | | | | |
Money market funds | $ | 27,943 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 27,943 |
|
Commercial paper | — |
| | 11,623 |
| | 11,623 |
|
Marketable securities | | | | | |
U.S. Treasuries | — |
| | 49,014 |
| | 49,014 |
|
Agency securities (Federal) | — |
| | 31,258 |
| | 31,258 |
|
Total | $ | 27,943 |
| | $ | 91,895 |
| | $ | 119,838 |
|
The Level 1 assets consist of our money market fund deposits. The Level 2 assets consist of our available-for-sale investment portfolio, which are valued utilizing a market approach. Our investments are priced by pricing vendors who provided observable inputs for their pricing without applying significant judgment. Broker pricing is used mainly when a quoted price is not available, the investment is not priced by our pricing vendors or when a broker price is more reflective of fair values in the market in which the investment trades. Our broker-priced investments are labeled as Level 2 investments because fair values of these investments are based on similar assets without applying significant judgments. In addition, all of
our investments have a sufficient level of trading volume to demonstrate that the fair values used are appropriate for these investments.
We did not have any transfers of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis to or from Level 1 and Level 2 during each of the three months ended March 29, 2014 and March 30, 2013.
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
We measure and report goodwill and intangible assets at fair value on a non-recurring basis if we determine these assets to be impaired. See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-Goodwill and Intangible Assets, for further details. We did not have any other assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the three months ended March 29, 2014.
Note 6 — Marketable Securities
We classify our marketable securities as available-for-sale. All marketable securities represent the investment of funds available for current operations, notwithstanding their contractual maturities. Such marketable securities are recorded at fair value and unrealized gains and losses are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income until realized.
Marketable securities at March 29, 2014 consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value |
U.S. Treasuries | $ | 51,373 |
| | $ | 44 |
| | $ | (13 | ) | | $ | 51,404 |
|
Commercial paper | 5,599 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,599 |
|
Agency securities (Federal) | 37,805 |
| | 1 |
| | (11 | ) | | 37,795 |
|
| $ | 94,777 |
| | $ | 45 |
| | $ | (24 | ) | | $ | 94,798 |
|
Marketable securities at December 28, 2013 consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value |
U.S. Treasuries | $ | 48,991 |
| | $ | 33 |
| | $ | (10 | ) | | $ | 49,014 |
|
Commercial paper | 11,623 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11,623 |
|
Agency securities (Federal) | 31,261 |
| | 1 |
| | (4 | ) | | 31,258 |
|
| $ | 91,875 |
| | $ | 34 |
| | $ | (14 | ) | | $ | 91,895 |
|
The marketable securities with gross unrealized losses have been in a loss position for less than twelve months as of March 29, 2014 and December 28, 2013, respectively.
When evaluating the investments for other-than-temporary impairment, we review factors such as the length of time and extent to which fair value has been below the amortized cost basis, review of current market liquidity, interest rate risk, the financial condition of the issuer, as well as credit rating downgrades. We believe that the unrealized losses are not other-than-temporary. We do not have a foreseeable need to liquidate the portfolio and anticipate recovering the full cost of the securities either as market conditions improve or as the securities mature.
Contractual maturities of marketable securities as of March 29, 2014 were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| Amortized Cost | | Fair Value |
Due in one year or less | $ | 63,399 |
| | $ | 63,413 |
|
Due after one year to five years | 31,378 |
| | 31,385 |
|
| $ | 94,777 |
| | $ | 94,798 |
|
Realized gains and losses on sales and maturities of marketable securities were immaterial for the three months ended March 29, 2014 and March 30, 2013, respectively.
Note 7 — Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
A reconciliation of the changes in our allowance for doubtful accounts receivable for the three months ended March 29, 2014 and March 30, 2013, respectively, is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 29, 2014 | | March 30, 2013 |
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 265 |
| | $ | 290 |
|
Additions | 5 |
| | — |
|
Reductions | — |
| | (3 | ) |
Balance at end of period | $ | 270 |
| | $ | 287 |
|
Note 8 — Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 29, 2014 | | December 28, 2013 |
Raw materials | $ | 7,072 |
| | $ | 7,411 |
|
Work-in-progress | 11,724 |
| | 10,531 |
|
Finished goods | 2,523 |
| | 2,765 |
|
| $ | 21,319 |
| | $ | 20,707 |
|
Note 9 — Warranty
A reconciliation of the changes in our warranty liability for the three months ended March 29, 2014 and March 30, 2013, respectively, is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 29, 2014 | | March 30, 2013 |
Balance at beginning of period | $ | 691 |
| | $ | 734 |
|
Accruals | 296 |
| | 88 |
|
Settlements | (525 | ) | | (355 | ) |
Balance at the end of period | $ | 462 |
| | $ | 467 |
|
Note 10 — Long-lived Assets
Impairment of long-lived assets
During the three months ended March 29, 2014 and March 30, 2013, we recorded $0.7 million and $0.1 million of impairments related to manufacturing assets we no longer utilize. These charges are included in "Impairments of long-lived assets" in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations in their respective periods.
Long-lived Assets
Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 29, 2014 | | December 28, 2013 |
Building | $ | — |
| | $ | 790 |
|
Machinery and equipment | 144,361 |
| | 143,463 |
|
Computer equipment and software | 34,981 |
| | 34,547 |
|
Capital leases | 860 |
| | 866 |
|
Furniture and fixtures | 5,501 |
| | 5,495 |
|
Leasehold improvements | 67,391 |
| | 67,384 |
|
Sub total | 253,094 |
| | 252,545 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | (224,053 | ) | | (221,346 | ) |
Net long-lived assets | 29,041 |
| | 31,199 |
|
Construction-in-progress | 1,008 |
| | 3,991 |
|
Total | $ | 30,049 |
| | $ | 35,190 |
|
Assets held for sale
During the three months ended March 29, 2014, we reclassified $0.8 million of building and $0.5 million of machinery and equipment from "Property, plant and equipment, net" to "Prepaid expenses and other current assets" in our balance sheet as these assets were identified as held for sale as of March 29, 2014.
Note 11 — Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Accumulated other comprehensive loss includes foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities. Components of accumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 29, 2014 | | December 28, 2013 |
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax of $428 at March 29, 2014 and December 29, 2013, respectively | $ | (407 | ) | | $ | (409 | ) |
Cumulative translation adjustments | 301 |
| | 160 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | $ | (106 | ) | | $ | (249 | ) |
Note 12 — Stockholders’ Equity
Restricted Stock Units
Restricted stock unit activity under our equity incentive plans during the three months ended March 29, 2014 is set forth below:
|
| | | | | | |
| Units | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
Restricted stock units at December 28, 2013 | 2,929,639 |
| | $ | 5.88 |
|
Awards granted | 1,197,000 |
| | 7.13 |
|
Awards vested | (413,276 | ) | | 5.83 |
|
Awards canceled | (190,622 | ) | | 5.80 |
|
Restricted stock units at March 29, 2014 | 3,522,741 |
| | $ | 6.32 |
|
The total fair value of restricted stock units vested during the three months ended March 29, 2014 and March 30, 2013 was $2.7 million and $1.8 million, respectively.
Stock Options
During the three months ended March 29, 2014 and March 30, 2013, we did not grant any stock options.
Note 13 — Stock-Based Compensation
We account for all stock-based compensation to employees and directors, including grants of stock options, as stock-based compensation costs based on the fair value measured as of the date of grant. These costs are recognized as an expense in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations over the requisite service period.
The table below shows stock-based compensation charges included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 29, 2014 | | March 30, 2013 |
Stock-based compensation included in: | |
| | |
|
Cost of revenues | $ | 494 |
| | $ | 524 |
|
Research and development | 624 |
| | 1,001 |
|
Selling, general and administrative | 1,452 |
| | 1,510 |
|
Total stock-based compensation | 2,570 |
| | 3,035 |
|
Tax effect of stock-based compensation | — |
| | — |
|
Total stock-based compensation, net of tax | $ | 2,570 |
| | $ | 3,035 |
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Under the 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the offering periods are 12 months commencing on February 1 of each calendar year and ending on January 31 of the subsequent calendar year, and a six month fixed offering period commencing on August 1 of each calendar year and ending on January 31 of the subsequent calendar year. The 12 month offering period consists of two six month purchase periods and the six month offering period consists of one six month purchase period. The price of the common stock purchased is 85% of the lesser of the fair market value of the common stock on the first day of the applicable offering period or the last day of each purchase period.
During the three months ended March 29, 2014 and March 30, 2013, we issued 320,919 and 286,928 shares respectively, under our approved employee stock purchase plans.
The following weighted-average assumptions were used in estimating the fair value of employees' purchase rights under our approved employee stock purchase plans:
|
| | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 29, 2014 | | March 30, 2013 |
ESPP: | |
| | |
|
Dividend yield | — | % | | — | % |
Expected volatility | 42.5 | % | | 38.4 | % |
Risk-free interest rate | 0.70 | % | | 0.11 | % |
Expected term (in years) | 0.50 |
| | 0.50 |
|
Unrecognized Compensation Costs
At March 29, 2014, the unrecognized stock-based compensation, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, was as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | |
| Unrecognized Expense | | Average Expected Recognition Period in years |
Stock options | $ | 522 |
| | 0.82 |
Restricted stock units | 11,467 |
| | 1.59 |
Employee stock purchase plan | 288 |
| | 0.34 |
Total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense | $ | 12,277 |
| | |
Note 14 — Net Loss per Share
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net loss per share for the three months ended March 29, 2014 and March 30, 2013, respectively, was based only on the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during that period as the inclusion of any common stock equivalents would have been anti-dilutive.
A reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the calculation of basic and diluted net loss per share is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 29, 2014 | | March 30, 2013 |
Numerator: | |
| | |
|
Net loss used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share | $ | (12,711 | ) | | $ | (19,773 | ) |
Denominator: | | | |
Weighted-average shares used in computing basic net loss per share | 55,050 |
| | 53,664 |
|
Add potentially dilutive securities | — |
| | — |
|
Weighted-average shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share | 55,050 |
| | 53,664 |
|
The following table sets forth the weighted-average number of all potentially dilutive securities excluded from the computation in the table above because their effect would have been anti-dilutive (in thousands):
|
| | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 29, 2014 | | March 30, 2013 |
Options to purchase common stock | 3,285 |
| | 4,167 |
|
Restricted stock units | 411 |
| | 610 |
|
Employee stock purchase plan | 24 |
| | 27 |
|
Total potentially dilutive securities | 3,720 |
| | 4,804 |
|
Note 15 — Income Taxes
We recorded an income tax provision of $0.3 million for the three months ended March 29, 2014 as compared to an income tax benefit of $0.2 million for the three months ended March 30, 2013. Income tax provisions reflect the tax provision on our non-U.S. operations in foreign jurisdictions and the tax benefit from the lapsing of the statute of limitations in foreign jurisdictions. We continue to maintain a valuation allowance for our U.S. Federal and state deferred tax assets.
The liability for uncertain tax positions was classified as a long-term income tax liability as payments or settlements are not anticipated over the next 12 months. It may be reduced when liabilities are settled with taxing authorities or when the statute of
limitations expire without assessment from tax authorities. We are unable to make a reasonable estimate as to when cash settlements with the relevant taxing authorities will occur. The unrecognized tax benefits amounted to $17.0 million during the three months ended March 29, 2014. If recognized, $2.3 million of these unrecognized tax benefits (net of federal tax benefit) would be recorded as a reduction of future income tax provision before consideration of changes in valuation allowance.
We classify interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as part of the income tax provision. For the three months ended March 30, 2013, we recognized an interest and penalty benefit of approximately $0.1 million. As of March 29, 2014 and March 30, 2013, we have accrued total interest and penalties of $0.2 million and $0.2 million for each of the respective periods related to the uncertain tax positions.
The amount of income taxes we pay is subject to ongoing audits by Federal, state and non-U.S. tax authorities which might result in proposed assessments. Our estimate for the potential outcome for any uncertain tax issue is judgmental in nature. A number of years may elapse before an uncertain tax position is audited and finally resolved. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain tax position, we believe that our reserves for income taxes reflect the most likely outcome. We adjust these reserves, as well as the related interest, in light of changing facts and circumstances. However, if an ultimate tax assessment exceeds our estimate of tax liabilities, additional tax expense will be recorded. The impact of such adjustments could have a material impact on our results of operations in future periods.
Note 16 — Commitments and Contingencies
Contractual and purchase obligations
We lease facilities under non-cancellable operating leases with various expiration dates through 2021. The facilities generally require us to pay property taxes, insurance and maintenance costs. Further, several lease agreements contain rent escalation clauses or rent holidays. For purposes of recognizing minimum rental expenses on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases, we use the date of initial possession to begin amortization. We have the option to extend or renew most of our leases, which may increase the future minimum lease commitments. Purchase obligations are primarily for purchases of inventory and manufacturing related service contracts. Purchase obligations are defined as agreements that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. Timing of payments and actual amounts paid may be different depending on the time of receipt of goods or services or changes to agreed-upon amounts for some obligations.
Our lease and purchase obligations have not materially changed during the three months ended March 29, 2014 from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013.
Environmental Matters
We are subject to U.S. federal, state and local, and foreign governmental laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including those governing the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, the clean-up of contaminated sites and the maintenance of a safe workplace. We believe that we comply in all material respects with the environmental laws and regulations that apply to us, including those of the California Department of Toxic Substances Control, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, the City of Livermore Water Resources Division, County of Santa Clara Department of Environmental Health, County of San Diego Hazardous Materials Division and Encino Water District, and the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health. We did not receive any notices of violations of environmental laws and regulations during the three months ended March 29, 2014, or in our fiscal 2013. We do not believe that any loss from environmental remediation liabilities would be in an amount material to our financial statements.
While we believe that we are in compliance in all material respects with the environmental laws and regulations that apply to us, in the future, we may receive environmental violation notices, and if received, final resolution of the violations identified by these notices could harm our operations, which may adversely impact our operating results and cash flows. New laws and regulations, amended enforcement practices around existing laws and regulations, the discovery of previously unknown contamination at our or others' sites or the imposition of new cleanup requirements could also harm our operations, thereby adversely impacting our operating results and cash flows.
Indemnification Arrangements
We have entered, and may from time to time in the ordinary course of our business enter, into contractual arrangements with third parties that include indemnification obligations. Under these contractual arrangements, we have agreed to defend, indemnify and/or hold the third party harmless from and against certain liabilities. These arrangements include indemnities in favor of customers in the event that our wafer probe cards infringe a third party's intellectual property and indemnities in favor of our lessors in connection with facility leasehold liabilities that we may cause. In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and certain of our officers, and our bylaws contain indemnification obligations in favor of our directors, officers and agents. These indemnity arrangements may limit the type of the claim, the total amount that we can be required to be paid in connection with the indemnification obligation and the time within which an indemnification claim can be made. The duration of the indemnification obligation may vary, and for most arrangements, survives the agreement term and is indefinite. We believe that substantially all of our indemnity arrangements provide either for limitations on the maximum potential future payments we could be obligated to make, or for limitations on the types of claims and damages we could be obligated to indemnify, or both. However, it is not possible to determine or reasonably estimate the maximum potential amount of future payments under these indemnification obligations due to the varying terms of such obligations, a lack of history of prior indemnification claims, the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular contractual arrangement and in each potential future claim for indemnification, and the contingency of any potential liabilities upon the occurrence of events that are not reasonably determinable. We have not had any material requests for indemnification under these arrangements. Our management believes that any liability for these indemnity arrangements would not be material to our accompanying consolidated financial statements. We have not recorded any liabilities for these indemnification arrangements on our consolidated balance sheet as of March 29, 2014.
Legal Matters
From time to time, we may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. For the three months ended March 29, 2014, we were not involved in any material legal proceedings. We identify below a proceeding filed in fiscal 2013, which, if not resolved amicably, either (i) includes allegations that could potentially result in a material legal proceeding, or (ii) the cost to defend the allegations through trial could be material. In the future we may become a party to additional legal proceedings that may require us to spend significant resources, including proceedings designed to protect our intellectual property rights. Litigation can be expensive and disruptive to normal business operations. Moreover, the results of legal proceedings are difficult to predict, and the costs incurred in litigation can be substantial, regardless of outcome.
Customs and Trade Matters
From time to time, we receive communications from certain jurisdictions regarding customs and indirect tax matters such as customs duties and value added taxes. For the three months ended March 29, 2014, we did not receive any communications from jurisdictions regarding any material customs duties or indirect tax matters.
Intellectual Property Litigation
In the ordinary course of business, the Company has been, and may in the future be, involved in commercial litigation relating to intellectual property. As of March 29, 2014, certain third party initiated challenges to one or more of our patents remained pending in Taiwan.
No provision has been made for intellectual property litigation because we believe that it is not probable that a liability had been incurred as of March 29, 2014. We could incur material attorneys' fees in prosecuting and defending actions related to intellectual property.
Other Litigation
In August 2013, a former employee (“Plaintiff”) filed a class action lawsuit against the Company in the Superior Court of California, alleging violations of California’s wage and hour laws and unfair business practices on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated current and former employees at the Company’s Livermore facilities from August 21, 2009 to the present. In February 2014, the Court granted the Company’s motion to strike portions of Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, clarifying the scope of the putative class. Procedurally, the case is in the early stages of litigation and the parties have agreed to conduct informal discovery and participate in a mediation during the third quarter of fiscal 2014. The Company does not believe that any settlement reached as a result of the mediation would be in an amount material to the Company's financial statements. The Company denies the allegations contained in the lawsuit and based on available information, believes it has
significant defenses to the allegations of the lawsuit. If the matter is not settled at mediation, the Company could incur material attorneys’ fees in defending the lawsuit.
Note 17 — Derivative Financial Instruments
We operate and sell our products in various global markets. As a result, we are exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We utilize foreign currency forward contracts to hedge against future movements in foreign exchange rates that affect certain existing foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. Under this program, our strategy is to have increases or decreases in our foreign currency exposures offset by gains or losses on the foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate the risks and volatility associated with foreign currency transaction gains or losses. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. Our derivative instruments are not designated as hedging instruments. We record the fair value of these contracts as of the end of our reporting period to our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet with changes in fair value recorded within “Other income, net” in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for both realized and unrealized gains and losses.
The following table provides information about our foreign currency forward contracts outstanding as of March 29, 2014 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | |
Currency | | Contract Position | | Contract Amount (Local Currency) | | Contract Amount (U.S. Dollars) |
Japanese Yen | | Sell | | 864,838 |
| | $ | 8,401 |
|
Taiwan Dollar | | Buy | | (18,287 | ) | | (603 | ) |
Korean Won | | Buy | | (1,595,607 | ) | | (1,495 | ) |
Total USD notional amount of outstanding foreign exchange contracts | | | | $ | 6,303 |
|
The contracts were entered into on March 28, 2014 and matured on April 25, 2014. Our foreign currency contracts are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy as they are valued using pricing models that utilize observable market inputs. There was no change in the value of these contracts as of March 29, 2014. Additionally, no gains or losses relating to the outstanding derivative contracts were recorded in the three months ended March 29, 2014.
The location and amount of gains and losses related to non-designated derivative instruments that matured in the three months ended March 29, 2014 and March 30, 2013 in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Amount of Loss Recognized on Derivatives |
| | | | Three Months Ended |
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments | | Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized on Derivatives | | March 29, 2014 | | March 30, 2013 |
Foreign exchange forward contracts | | Other income (expense), net | | $ | (174 | ) | | $ | 228 |
|
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Securities Act of 1933, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements include statements concerning, among other things, our business strategy (including anticipated trends and developments in, and management plans for, our business and the markets in which we operate), financial results, operating results, revenues, gross margin, operating expenses, products, projected costs and capital expenditures, research and development programs, sales and marketing initiatives and competition. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words, such as "may," "might," "will," "could," "should," "expect," "plan," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "predict," "intend" and "continue," the negative or plural of these words and other comparable terminology.
The forward-looking statements are only predictions based on our current expectations and our projections about future events. All forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are based upon information available to us as of the filing date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We have no obligation to update any of these statements. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these statements. These factors include the matters discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2013 and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. You should carefully consider the numerous risks and uncertainties described under these sections.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Unless expressly stated or the context otherwise requires, the terms “we,” “our,” “us” and “FormFactor” refer to FormFactor, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Overview
We design, develop, manufacture, sell and support precision, high performance advanced semiconductor wafer probe card products and solutions. We are the largest probe card manufacturer, and semiconductor manufacturers use our wafer probe cards to perform wafer sort and test on semiconductor die, or chips, prior to wafer singulation. We work closely with our customers on product design, as each wafer probe card is a custom product that is specific to the chip and wafer designs of the customer. During wafer sort and test, a wafer probe card is mounted on a prober and electrically connected to a semiconductor tester. The wafer probe card is used as an interface to connect electrically with and test individual chips on a wafer. Using our wafer probe cards to test at this stage of the manufacturing process, our customers can reduce their cost of test by identifying defective chips prior to incurring the time and costs of packaging defective chips. We work closely with our customers on product design, as each wafer probe card is a custom product that is specific to the chip and wafer designs of the customer. We operate in a single industry segment and have derived substantially all of our revenues from the sale of wafer probe cards incorporating our proprietary technology.
Historically, sales for wafer probe cards for testing Dynamic Random Access Memory, or DRAM, devices have made up the majority of our revenues. In October 2012, we completed the acquisition of Astria Semiconductor Holdings, Inc., including its subsidiary Micro-Probe Incorporated (together "MicroProbe"). The majority of MicroProbe's revenue is made up of sales of wafer probe cards for testing System-on-Chip, or SoC devices.
Revenues for the three months ended March 29, 2014 increased 6%, or $3.3 million, as compared to the corresponding period in the prior year. For the three months ended March 29, 2014, our revenues increased approximately 13% in our SoC products, increased 1% in our DRAM products and decreased approximately 5% in our Flash memory products, as compared to the corresponding period in the prior year.
We incurred a net loss of $12.7 million in the first three months of fiscal 2014 as compared to a net loss of $19.8 million in the first three months of fiscal 2013. The decrease in net loss is primarily attributable to our ongoing cost reduction and restructuring efforts as well as increased revenues.
Our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities and restricted cash totaled approximately $144 million as of March 29, 2014, as compared to approximately $152 million at December 28, 2013. The decrease in our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balances was primarily due to the use of cash for operating activities in the first fiscal quarter of
2014. We believe that we will be able to satisfy our working capital requirements for at least the next twelve months with the liquidity provided by our existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. If we are unsuccessful in increasing our revenues, improving our operating efficiency, reducing our cash outlays or increasing our available cash through financing, our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities will decline in future fiscal years.
We believe the following information is important to understanding our business, our financial statements and the remainder of this discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations:
Revenues. We derive substantially all of our revenues from product sales of wafer probe cards. Revenues from our customers are subject to fluctuations due to factors including, but not limited to, design cycles, technology adoption rates, competitive pressure to reduce prices, cyclicality of the different end markets into which our customers' products are sold and market conditions in the semiconductor industry. Historically, increases in revenues have resulted from increased demand for our existing products, the introduction of new, more complex products and the penetration of new markets. We expect that revenues from the sale of wafer probe cards will continue to account for substantially all of our revenues for the foreseeable future.
Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues consists primarily of manufacturing materials, payroll, shipping and handling costs, manufacturing-related overhead and amortization of certain intangible assets. Our manufacturing operations rely upon a limited number of suppliers to provide key components and materials for our products, some of which are a sole source. We order materials and supplies based on backlog and forecasted customer orders. Tooling and setup costs related to changing manufacturing lots at our suppliers are also included in the cost of revenues. We expense all warranty costs and inventory provisions as cost of revenues.
We design, manufacture and sell custom advanced wafer probe cards into the semiconductor test market, which is subject to significant variability and demand fluctuations. Our wafer probe cards are complex products that are custom to a specific chip design of a customer and must be delivered on relatively short lead-times as compared to our overall manufacturing process. As our advanced wafer probe cards are manufactured in low volumes and must be delivered on relatively short lead-times, it is not uncommon for us to acquire production materials and start certain production activities based on estimated production yields and forecasted demand prior to or in excess of actual demand for our wafer probe cards. We record an adjustment to our inventory valuation for estimated obsolete and non-sellable inventories based on assumptions about future demand, past usage, changes to manufacturing processes and overall market conditions.
Research and Development. Research and development expenses include expenses related to product development, engineering and material costs. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. We plan to continue to invest in research and development activities to improve and enhance existing product technologies and to develop new technologies for current and new products and for new applications.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses include expenses related to sales, marketing, administrative personnel, internal and outside sales representatives' commissions, market research and consulting, and other sales, marketing, administrative activities, amortization of certain intangible assets, and provision for doubtful accounts. These expenses also include costs for protecting and enforcing our intellectual property rights and regulatory compliance costs.
Restructuring Charges. Restructuring charges include costs related to employee termination benefits, cost of long-lived assets abandoned or impaired, as well as contract termination costs.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets. Asset impairment charges include charges associated with the write-down of assets that have no future expected benefit or for assets that have been determined to be impaired as well as adjustments to the carrying amount of our assets held for sale.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our operating results as a percentage of revenues for the periods indicated:
|
| | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 29, 2014 | | March 30, 2013 |
Revenues | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % |
Cost of revenues | 78.0 |
| | 82.8 |
|
Gross profit | 22.0 |
| | 17.2 |
|
Operating expenses: | |
| | |
Research and development | 17.4 |
| | 20.8 |
|
Selling, general and administrative | 21.9 |
| | 27.8 |
|
Restructuring charges, net | 3.6 |
| | 7.6 |
|
Impairment of long-lived assets | 1.3 |
| | 0.1 |
|
Total operating expenses | 44.2 |
| | 56.3 |
|
Operating loss | (22.2 | ) | | (39.1 | ) |
Interest income, net | 0.1 |
| | 0.2 |
|
Other income (expense), net | (0.1 | ) | | 0.8 |
|
Loss before income taxes | (22.2 | ) | | (38.1 | ) |
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | 0.6 |
| | (0.4 | ) |
Net loss | (22.8 | )% | | (37.7 | )% |
Three months ended March 29, 2014 and March 30, 2013:
Revenues
Revenues by Market
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 29, 2014 | | March 30, 2013 | | % Change |
| (In thousands, except percentages) |
SoC | $ | 29,758 |
| | $ | 26,431 |
| | 12.6 | % |
DRAM | 22,181 |
| | 21,970 |
| | 1.0 |
|
Flash | 4,020 |
| | 4,219 |
| | (4.7 | ) |
Total revenues | $ | 55,959 |
| | $ | 52,620 |
| | 6.3 | % |
Revenues for the three months ended March 29, 2014 increased 6%, or $3.3 million, as compared to the corresponding period in the prior year. For the three months ended March 29, 2014, our revenue increased approximately 13% in our SoC products, increased 1% in our DRAM products and decreased approximately 5% in our Flash memory products, as compared to the corresponding period in the prior year. The overall increase in revenues was primarily driven by higher unit volume in the SoC wire bond product market. Smart phone and tablet DRAM demand increased in the three months ended March 29, 2014 compared to the corresponding period in 2013 and was partially offset by reduced demand for personal computing commodity DRAM. The slight decrease in Flash memory revenue was primarily in the NAND Flash memory area resulting from reduced demand for our TouchMatrix product in the three months ended March 29, 2014.
Revenues by Geographic Region
The following table sets forth our revenues by geographic region for the periods indicated:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 29, 2014 | | % of Revenue | | March 30, 2013 | | % of Revenue |
| (In thousands, except percentages) |
North America | $ | 15,742 |
| | 28.1 | % | | $ | 14,266 |
| | 27.1 | % |
South Korea | 12,620 |
| | 22.6 |
| | 10,134 |
| | 19.3 |
|
Taiwan | 9,625 |
| | 17.2 |
| | 14,351 |
| | 27.3 |
|
Japan | 7,690 |
| | 13.7 |
| | 5,062 |
| | 9.6 |
|
Europe | 6,096 |
| | 10.9 |
| | 2,912 |
| | 5.5 |
|
Asia-Pacific (1) | 4,186 |
| | 7.5 |
| | 5,895 |
| | 11.2 |
|
Total revenues | $ | 55,959 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 52,620 |
| | 100.0 | % |
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
| |
(1) | Asia-Pacific includes all countries in the region except Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan, which are disclosed separately. |
Geographic revenue information is based on the location to which we ship the customer product. For example, if a certain South Korean customer purchases through their North American subsidiary and requests the products to be shipped to an address in Asia-Pacific, this sale will be reflected in the revenue for Asia-Pacific rather than North America.
The increases in North America and Europe revenues for the three months ended March 29, 2014, when compared to the same period in 2013, were driven by increased SoC product shipments for both flip chip and wire bond applications. The decrease in Taiwan revenues for the three months ended March 29, 2014, when compared to the same period in 2013, was driven by a combination of decreased SoC product shipments and a decrease in mobile phone and tablet-based DRAM and Flash demand. The increase in South Korea revenues for the three months ended March 29, 2014 when compared to the same period in 2013 was primarily due to increased mobile processor-based SOC product shipments. The increase in Japan revenues was driven by higher demand for both SoC wire bond products and our SmartMatrix DRAM product.
The following customers accounted for more than 10% of our revenues for the periods indicated:
|
| | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 29, 2014 | | March 30, 2013 |
SK Hynix | 17.1 | % | | 19.1 | % |
Intel | 16.2 | % | | 18.0 | % |
Micron | 15.0 | % | | * |
|
| 48.3 | % | | 37.1 | % |
| |
* | Less than 10% of revenues. |
Gross Profit
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 29, 2014 | | March 30, 2013 |
| (In thousands, except percentages) |
Gross profit | $ | 12,325 |
| | $ | 9,075 |
|
% of revenues | 22.0 | % | | 17.2 | % |
Gross profit fluctuates with revenue levels, product mix, selling prices, factory loading, and material costs. For the three months ended March 29, 2014, the amount of gross profit increased compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower material costs, lower labor expenses and overhead charges as a result of our cost reduction initiatives and favorable production yields. Our net inventory provision charges remained relatively flat between the three months ended
March 29, 2014 and the corresponding period in the prior year. For the three months ended March 29, 2014, the value of previously reserved materials that were used in manufacturing and shipped was $0.8 million.
Gross profit included stock-based compensation expense of $0.5 million for the three months ended March 29, 2014 and March 30, 2013, respectively.
Future gross margins may be adversely impacted by lower levels of product revenues, even though we have taken significant steps to reduce our operating cost structure. Our gross margins may also be adversely affected if we are required to record additional inventory provision charges and inventory write-downs if estimated average selling prices of products held in finished goods and work in process inventories are below the manufacturing cost of those products.
Research and Development
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 29, 2014 | | March 30, 2013 |
| (In thousands, except percentages) |
R&D | $ | 9,747 |
| | $ | 10,929 |
|
% of revenues | 17.4 | % | | 20.8 | % |
Research and development expenses for the three months ended March 29, 2014 decreased by $1.2 million compared to the same period in the prior year as a result of our ongoing cost reduction and restructuring efforts which were primarily comprised of a reduction in our headcount and stock compensation expense of approximately $0.6 million and $0.4 million, respectively. As a percent of revenues, research and development expenses decreased 3.4% during the three months ended March 29, 2014 from the comparable period of the prior year.
Stock-based compensation expense included in research and development expenses was $0.6 million for the three months ended March 29, 2014 compared to $1.0 million for the three months ended March 30, 2013.
Selling, General and Administrative
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 29, 2014 | | March 30, 2013 |
| (In thousands, except percentages) |
Selling, general and administrative | $ | 12,254 |
| | $ | 14,618 |
|
% of revenues | 21.9 | % | | 27.8 | % |
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 29, 2014 decreased by $2.4 million compared to the same period in the prior year as a result of our ongoing cost reduction and restructuring efforts which were primarily comprised of a reduction in our integration and headcount expense of approximately $1.0 million and $0.7 million, respectively. Additionally, our overall travel and general operating expenses decreased by approximately $0.6 million compared to the same period in the prior year. As a percent of revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased approximately 5.9% during the three months ended March 29, 2014 from the comparable period of the prior year.
Stock-based compensation expense included within selling, general and administrative expenses was $1.5 million for the three months ended March 29, 2014 compared to $1.5 million for the same period in the prior year.
Restructuring Charges, net
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 29, 2014 | | March 30, 2013 |
| (In thousands, except percentages) |
Restructuring charges, net | $ | 1,997 |
| | $ | 3,980 |
|
% of revenues | 3.6 | % | | 7.6 | % |
For the three months ended March 29, 2014, restructuring charges decreased by $2.0 million from the comparable period of the prior year. Our restructuring activities are discussed below.
2014 Restructuring Activities
On January 27, 2014, we announced a global organizational restructuring and cost reduction plan (the "Q1 2014 Restructuring Plan"). As part of the plan, the Company eliminated 52 full-time employees. In addition, we reduced our temporary workforce by 9 positions. We recorded $2.0 million of restructuring charges during the first fiscal quarter of fiscal 2014, which was comprised of $1.4 million in severance and related benefits and $0.6 million in impairment charges for certain equipment that would no longer be utilized. We expect to realize about $2 million in savings per quarter beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2014.
The liabilities we accrued represent our best estimate of the obligations we expect to incur and could be subject to adjustment as market conditions change. The remaining cash payments associated with our various reductions in workforce are expected to be paid by the end of the second fiscal quarter of fiscal 2014. As such, the restructuring accrual is recorded as a current liability within ‘Accrued liabilities’ in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
2013 Restructuring Activities
In the first fiscal quarter of fiscal 2013, we implemented a restructuring plan (the "Q1 2013 Restructuring Plan") which resulted in the reduction of our global workforce by 31 employees across the organization. In addition we reduced our temporary workforce by approximately 20 positions. We also suspended development activities and engineering efforts for our next generation DRAM Matrix platform and terminated development activities for a certain SoC product platform. We recorded
$4.0 million of restructuring charges during the first fiscal quarter of fiscal 2013, which was comprised of $1.3 million in severance and related benefits and $2.7 million in impairment charges for certain equipment that would no longer be utilized. The activities comprising this restructuring activity were completed in fiscal 2013.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 29, 2014 | | March 30, 2013 |
| (In thousands, except percentages) |
Impairment of long-lived assets | $ | 743 |
| | $ | 58 |
|
% of revenues | 1.3 | % | | 0.1 | % |
During the three months ended March 29, 2014, we recorded an impairment charge of $0.7 million related to certain manufacturing assets which will no longer be utilized.
Management believes it is reasonably possible that additional impairment charges that would further reduce the carrying amounts of our property, plant and equipment and intangible assets may arise in fiscal 2014 if we are unable to achieve cash flows anticipated by our forecasted financial plan.
Interest Income, Net and Other Income, Net
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 29, 2014 | | March 30, 2013 |
| (In thousands, except percentages) |
Interest income, net | $ | 79 |
| | $ | 107 |
|
% of revenue | 0.1 | % | | 0.2 | % |
Other income (expense), net | $ | (66 | ) | | $ | 423 |
|
% of revenues | (0.1 | )% | | 0.8 | % |
Interest income is primarily earned on our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. The decrease in interest income for the three months ended March 29, 2014 as compared with the same period of the prior year was primarily the result of lower average balances. Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and marketable securities were $144.4 million at March 29, 2014 compared to $151.5 million at December 28, 2013, and $154.0 million at March 30, 2013. The weighted-average yield on our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities for the three months ended March 29, 2014 and March 30, 2013 was 0.17% and 0.31%, respectively.
Other income (expense), net is comprised primarily of foreign currency impact and various other gains and losses. The change in other income (expense), net for the three months ended March 29, 2014 compared to March 30, 2013 was due primarily to foreign currency exchange losses and a patent litigation settlement paid in the three months ended March 30, 2013.
Provision for (Benefit From) Income Taxes
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 29, 2014 | | March 30, 2013 |
| (In thousands, except percentages) |
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes | $ | 308 |
| | $ | (207 | ) |
Effective tax rate | (2.5 | )% | | 1.0 | % |
We recorded an income tax provision of $0.3 million for the three months ended March 29, 2014 as compared to an income tax benefit of $0.2 million for the three months ended March 30, 2013. Income tax provisions reflect the tax provision on our non-U.S. operations in foreign jurisdictions and the tax benefit from the lapsing of the statute of limitations in US and foreign jurisdictions. We continue to maintain a valuation allowance for our U.S. Federal and state deferred tax assets.
We classify interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as part of the income tax provision. For the three months ended March 30, 2013, we recognized an interest and penalty benefit of approximately $0.1 million. As of March 29, 2014 and March 30, 2013, we have accrued total interest and penalties of $0.2 million and $0.2 million for each of the respective periods related to the uncertain tax positions.
We anticipate that we will continue to record a valuation allowance against our U.S. and certain non U.S. deferred tax assets. We expect our future tax provisions, during the time such valuation allowances are recorded, will consist primarily of the tax provision of our profitable non-U.S. jurisdictions.
Our effective tax rate may vary from period to period based on changes in estimated taxable income or loss by jurisdiction, changes to the valuation allowance, changes to Federal, state or foreign tax laws, future expansion into areas with varying country, state, and local income tax rates, deductibility of certain costs and expenses by jurisdiction.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Capital Resources: Our working capital was $175.5 million at March 29, 2014 and $173.9 million at December 28, 2013. The increase in working capital in the three months ended March 29, 2014 was primarily due to an increase in accounts receivable due to increased sales as compared to the three months ended December 28, 2013 and the reclassification of our long-lived assets to current assets as assets held for sale.
Cash and cash equivalents consist of deposits held at banks, money market funds, U.S. government securities and commercial paper that at the time of purchase had maturities of 90 days or less. Marketable securities consist of U.S. government and agency securities and commercial paper. We typically invest in highly-rated securities with low probabilities of default. Our investment policy requires investments to be rated single-A or better, and limits the types of acceptable investments, issuer concentration and duration of the investment.
Our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities totaled approximately $144.0 million at March 29, 2014, as compared to $151.1 million at December 28, 2013. The decrease in our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balances was primarily due to the use of cash for operating activities and cash used to acquire property, plant and equipment in the three months ended March 29, 2014. We believe that we will be able to satisfy our working capital requirements for at least the next twelve months with the liquidity provided by our existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. If we are unsuccessful in increasing revenue, improving our operating efficiency, reducing our cash outlays or increasing our available cash through financing, our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities will further decline in fiscal 2014.
We utilize a variety of tax planning and financing strategies in an effort to manage our worldwide cash and deploy funds to locations where they are needed. As part of these strategies, we indefinitely reinvest a significant portion of our foreign earnings and our current plans do not demonstrate a need to repatriate these earnings. Should we require additional capital in the United States, we may elect to repatriate indefinitely reinvested foreign funds or raise capital in the United States through debt. If we were to repatriate indefinitely reinvested foreign funds, we would be required to accrue and pay additional United States taxes less applicable foreign tax credits.
Days Sales Outstanding: Days sales outstanding from receivables, or DSO, were 59 days at March 29, 2014 compared with 52 days at December 28, 2013. Our DSO calculation is determined using the count back method and is based on gross accounts receivable (including accounts receivable for amounts in deferred revenue). The increase in DSO is primarily due to higher sales to customers on 60 day payment terms during the three months ended March 29, 2014 as compared to the three months ended December 28, 2013.
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended |
| March 29, 2014 | | March 30, 2013 |
| (In thousands) |
Net cash used in operating activities | $ | (6,876 | ) | | $ | (9,667 | ) |
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | (4,629 | ) | | 14,472 |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities | $ | 1,294 |
| | $ | 1,000 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: Net cash used in operating activities for the three months ended March 29, 2014 was primarily attributable to the net change in operating assets and liabilities. The Company had a net loss of $12.7 million which was offset by non-cash expenses of $14.6 million, including $8.1 million of depreciation and amortization, $2.6 million of provision for excess and obsolete inventories, $2.6 million of stock-based compensation, $0.7 million of impairment of long-lived assets and $0.6 million of assets written-off as part of our restructuring activities.
The net change in operating assets and liabilities for the three months ended March 29, 2014 resulted in a net use of cash of $8.8 million and which was comprised of cash used of $6.8 million in accounts receivable due to higher sales, $3.2 million of cash used for inventory due to inventory build and an increase of prepaid expenses and other current assets of $0.3 million. The above use of cash was offset in part by an increase of $0.6 million in accounts payable driven by the timing of our payments on vendor obligations, an increase of $0.4 million in deferred revenues due to shipments to customers for which our revenue recognition criteria have not yet been met, an increase in income tax payable of $0.3 million and an increase of $0.2 million in accrued liabilities due to accrued payroll.
Net cash used in operating activities for the three months ended March 30, 2013 was primarily attributable to our net loss of $19.8 million offset in part by $16.4 million of non-cash charges consisting primarily of $3.0 million of stock-based compensation, $7.4 million of depreciation and amortization, $2.7 million of assets written-off as part of our restructuring plan and $2.7 million of provision for excess and obsolete inventories. The net change in operating assets and liabilities for the three months ended March 30, 2013 was a use of cash of $6.3 million comprising an increase in our accounts receivable of $4.8 million due to an increase in sales transactions closer to our quarter end, an increase in inventory of $3.8 million as we built more inventory to support higher forecasted demand in future quarters and a reduction of $3.0 million in accrued liabilities.
Working capital sources of cash were primarily an increase of $3.6 million in accounts payable driven by the timing of invoice receipts and payments to vendors.
Cash flows from investing activities: Net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 29, 2014 was primarily related to purchases of marketable securities totaling $31.7 million and cash used in the acquisition of property and equipment of $1.6 million, offset by $28.7 million of proceeds from maturities of marketable securities. We carefully monitor our investments to minimize risks and have not experienced other than temporary investment losses. Except for experiencing declining yields, our investment portfolio has not been negatively impacted by the economic turmoil in the credit markets in the recent past.
Net cash provided by investing activities for the three months ended March 30, 2013 was primarily related to $34.5 million of proceeds from maturities of marketable securities, offset by purchases of marketable securities totaling $17.2 million, and $2.7 million cash used in the acquisition of property and equipment.
Cash flows from financing activities: Net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 29, 2014 and March 30, 2013 included $1.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively, from purchases under our 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, offset by stock withheld in lieu of payment of employee taxes related to the release of restricted stock units.
Our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities declined in the three months ended March 29, 2014. We continue to focus on improving our operating efficiency to increase operating cash flows. Our actions have included implementing operational expense reduction initiatives, delaying or eliminating certain capital spending and research and development projects, focusing on timely customer collections and re-negotiating longer payment terms with our vendors. We believe that we will be able to satisfy our cash requirements for at least the next twelve months with the liquidity provided by our existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. To the extent necessary, we may also consider establishing manufacturing and technology partnerships, or to seek short and long-term debt obligations, or to obtain new financing facilities which may not be available on terms favorable to us or at all. Our future capital requirements may vary materially from those now planned. However, if we are unsuccessful in increasing revenues, improving our operating efficiency, executing our cost reduction plan, reducing our cash outlays or increasing our available cash through financing, our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities will decline in future fiscal quarters.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Historically, we have not participated in transactions that have generated relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As of March 29, 2014, we were not involved in any such off-balance sheet arrangements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our critical accounting policies are disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2013. Our critical accounting policies have not changed during the three months ended March 29, 2014.
Furthermore, the preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Our management believes that we consistently apply these judgments and estimates and the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes fairly represent all periods presented. However, any differences between these judgments and estimates and actual results could have a material impact on our consolidated statements of income and financial position.
Critical accounting estimates, as defined by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, are those that are most important to the portrayal of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations and require our management’s most difficult and subjective judgments and estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Our critical accounting estimates include those regarding (1) revenue recognition and the fair value of revenue elements, (2) fair value of marketable securities, (3) accruals for liabilities, including restructuring charges, (4) warranty accruals, (5) valuation of inventories, including obsolete and slow moving inventory, (6) allowance for doubtful accounts, (7) valuation of our long-lived assets including goodwill as well as the assessment of recoverability of such long-lived assets, (8) provision for income taxes, tax liabilities and valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, and (9) valuation and recognition of stock-based compensation. For a discussion of our critical accounting estimates, see Item 7: “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2013.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
For financial market risks related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, reference is made to Item 7A: “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” contained in Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013. Our exposure to market risk has not changed materially since December 28, 2013.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Based on our management’s evaluation (with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer), as of the end of the period covered by this report, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”)) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
Control systems, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control systems’ objectives are being met. Further, the design of any control systems must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of all controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Control systems can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based, in part, on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.
CEO and CFO Certifications
We have attached as exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q the certifications of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, which are required in accordance with the Exchange Act. We recommend that this Item 4 be read in conjunction with the certifications for a more complete understanding of the subject matter presented.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The information relating to “Legal Matters” set forth under Note 18-Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes during the three months ended March 29, 2014 to the risk factors discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2013. If any of the identified risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer. The trading price of our common stock could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment in our common stock. The risks and uncertainties described in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2013 are not the only ones we face. Additional risks that we currently do not know about or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also impair our business operations. We may make acquisitions and investments, which could put a strain on our resources, cause ownership dilution to our stockholders and adversely affect our financial results.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Exhibit | | | | Incorporated by Reference | | Filed |
Number | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date | | Number | | Herewith |
| | | | | | | | | | |
31.01 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | | | | | X |
| | | | | | | | | | |
31.02 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | | | | | X |
| | | | | | | | | | |
32.01 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | | | | | * |
| | | | | | | | | | |
101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document | | | | | | | | X |
| | | | | | | | | | |
101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | | | | | | | | X |
| | | | | | | | | | |
101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | | | | | | | | X |
| | | | | | | | | | |
101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | | | | | | | | X |
| | | | | | | | | | |
101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | | | | | | | | X |
| | | | | | | | | | |
101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | | | | | | | | X |
| | | | | | | | | | |
______________________________________
| |
* | This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filings. |
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | |
| | FormFactor, Inc. |
| | | |
Date: | May 6, 2014 | By: | /s/ Michael M. Ludwig |
| | | |
| | | Michael M. Ludwig |
| | | Chief Financial Officer |
| | | (Duly Authorized Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer) |
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Exhibit | | | | Incorporated by Reference | | Filed |
Number | | Exhibit Description | | Form | | Date | | Number | | Herewith |
| | | | | | | | | | |
31.01 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | | | | | X |
| | | | | | | | | | |
31.02 | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 7241, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | | | | | X |
| | | | | | | | | | |
32.01 | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | | | | | | | | * |
| | | | | | | | | | |
101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document | | | | | | | | X |
| | | | | | | | | | |
101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | | | | | | | | X |
| | | | | | | | | | |
101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | | | | | | | | X |
| | | | | | | | | | |
101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | | | | | | | | X |
| | | | | | | | | | |
101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | | | | | | | | X |
| | | | | | | | | | |
101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | | | | | | | | X |
| | | | | | | | | | |
______________________________________
| |
* | This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filings. |
EX-31.01 (Q1 2014)
Exhibit 31.01
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. SECTION 7241, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Thomas St. Dennis, certify that:
| |
1. | I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FormFactor, Inc.; |
| |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
| |
4. | The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
| |
a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
| |
b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
| |
c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
| |
d. | Disclosed in the quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
| |
5. | The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| |
a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
| |
b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
|
| | |
Date: | May 6, 2014 | /s/ THOMAS ST. DENNIS |
| | Thomas St. Dennis Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Director) |
EX-31.02 (Q1 2014)
Exhibit 31.02
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. SECTION 7241,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Michael M. Ludwig, certify that:
| |
1. | I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FormFactor, Inc.; |
| |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
| |
4. | The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
| |
a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
| |
b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
| |
c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
| |
d. | Disclosed in the quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
| |
5. | The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| |
a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
| |
b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
|
| | |
Date: | May 6, 2014 | /s/ MICHAEL M. LUDWIG |
| | Michael M. Ludwig Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
EX-32.01 (Q1 2014)
Exhibit 32.01
CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FormFactor, Inc., a Delaware corporation, for the period ended March 29, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, each of the undersigned officers of FormFactor, Inc. certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his respective knowledge:
| |
1. | The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
| |
2. | The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FormFactor, Inc. for the periods presented therein. |
|
| | |
Date: | May 6, 2014 | /s/ THOMAS ST. DENNIS |
| | Thomas St. Dennis Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Director) |
Date: | May 6, 2014 | /s/ MICHAEL M. LUDWIG |
| | Michael M. Ludwig Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |